K&L Gates LLP T 206.623.7580 www.klgates.com |
July 1, 2009
Daniel F. Duchovny, Special Counsel
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: |
Zumiez Inc. Schedule TO-I |
|
Filed June 22, 2009 |
|
File No. 005-81394 |
Dear Mr. Duchovny:
On behalf of our client Zumiez Inc. (the Company), I am writing in response to the letter from you dated June 29, 2009, setting forth comments of the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the Staff) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) with respect to the above-referenced filing for the Company (the Schedule TO).
We have been authorized by the Company to deliver its responses to the Staffs comments set forth below. All responses pertaining to the Company set forth in this letter were prepared by the Company in consultation with K&L Gates LLP. Simultaneous with the delivery of this letter, the Company has filed Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule TO (the Amendment), with changes responsive to your comment letter.
Below we have reprinted the Staffs comments in bold italics and set forth our responses thereto.
Summary Term Sheet, page 1
RESPONSE: |
In accordance with the Staffs comment, and reflected in the Amendment, we have revised the disclosures in Q28 and on page 25 to state that the Company |
Daniel F. Duchovny, Special Counsel
July 1, 2009
Page 2
|
will announce an extension no later than 9 a.m. Eastern time on the next business day after the stated expiration date. |
Conditions of the Exchange Offer, page 15
RESPONSE: |
In accordance with the Staffs comment, and reflected in the Amendment, we have revised the first paragraph on page 15 and the last paragraph on page 17 to exclude references to actions or omission to act by the Company. Specifically, we have deleted the reference to (including any action or omission by us) on page 15, and the reference to regardless of the circumstances giving rise to them on page 17. |
RESPONSE: |
We hereby confirm our understanding of the Staffs analysis set forth in Comment 3 above. In the event a condition is triggered and the Company decides to proceed with the offer anyway, such action would constitute a waiver of the triggered condition. If such waiver is material, the Company acknowledges and agrees that it may be required to extend the offer and re-circulate new disclosure to security holders. |
Daniel F. Duchovny, Special Counsel
July 1, 2009
Page 3
RESPONSE: |
We hereby confirm our understanding of the Staffs analysis set forth in Comment 4 above. In the event a condition is triggered and the Company decides to proceed with the offer anyway, such action would constitute a waiver of the triggered condition. If an offer condition is triggered by events that occur during the offer period and before the expiration of the offer, the Company acknowledges that it should promptly inform holders of eligible options how the Company intends to proceed, rather than waiting until the end of the offer period, unless the condition is one where satisfaction of the condition may be determined only upon expiration. |
Information Concerning Us: Financial Information, page 21
4. It appears you have incorporated by reference the financial information required by Item 1010(a)f Regulation M-A. We note, however, that you have not provided the summary information required by Item 1010(c) of Regulation M-A. Please revise to provide that disclosure or your analysis as to why such disclosure is not necessary.
RESPONSE: |
In accordance with the Staffs comment, and reflected in the Amendment, we have supplemented the summary financial information to comply with the requirements of Item 1010(c) of Regulation M-A. Specifically, we have added noncurrent assets, noncurrent liabilities, gross profits, and ratio of earnings to fixed charges in the summary financial disclosures. We also note by way of comment that all of the Companys income consists of income from continuing operations, and therefore the Company does not separately calculate or report income from continuing operations. |
Material U S Federal Income Tax Consequences, page 24
RESPONSE: |
In accordance with the Staffs comment, and reflected in the Amendment, we have removed the legend regarding Treasury Department Circular 230. |
I hereby represent and acknowledge on behalf of the Company to the Staff the following:
· The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings with the Commission;
Daniel F. Duchovny, Special Counsel
July 1, 2009
Page 4
· The Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments in the Companys filings with the Commission that are reviewed by the Staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to such filing; and
· The Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
I respectfully request that the Staff advise the undersigned at (206) 370-8343 of any additional comments that the Staff may have or whether our explanation and proposed undertaking in response to the comment letter satisfy the Staffs review.
Very truly yours,
K&L GATES LLP
By |
/s/ Chris K. Visser |
|
|
Chris K. Visser |
CKV:ckv